Abstract
Ebola virus disease remains a major public-health and governance challenge in Africa because of its high case-fatality rates and its capacity to disrupt health systems, economies, institutions, and communities. This article provides a qualitative comparative analysis of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, combining structured documentary analysis, secondary epidemiological and economic data, institutional reports, and peer-reviewed studies. It examines health, economic, social, political, institutional, and science, technology, and innovation (STI) impacts through the analytical lens of differentiated resilience. The study addresses a gap in the literature by integrating interregional comparison, institutional learning, community trust, innovation capacity, and the Bundibugyo virus disease extension within a single framework. The findings reveal divergent trajectories: the 2014–2016 West African outbreak produced a systemic crisis and severe disruption of health services, whereas recurrent outbreaks in the DRC contributed to accumulated operational experience, improved surveillance, vaccination strategies, and institutional learning, despite conflict and mistrust. Ebola thus operates simultaneously as a destructive shock and a catalyst for adaptation. The article argues that effective preparedness requires the articulation of national capacity, international coordination, community legitimacy, and locally embedded innovation systems. It concludes that African health resilience should be treated as a strategic STI and health-governance priority requiring sustained investment in surveillance, diagnostics, vaccine delivery, emergency financing, community trust, essential-service continuity, and cross-border response mechanisms.
Full Text
The full text of this article is currently available via the PDF link in the sidebar.